Successful international collaboration: australian experiences in BUEB research
Kolnhofer-Derecskei Anita was the first to be given the opportunity to spend one month in Melbourne, Australia, as part of the project titled “The Democratic Role of Universities: Practicing Democratic Values in Science, Education and Civic Engagement.” The visit served as preparation for empirical research within the DRU WP5 – Education in a Hospitable University subproject.
The professional program focused on comparing the Hungarian and Australian higher education systems. During consultations with experts from Deakin University, key topics included the operations and funding of universities, the situation of students and academic staff, and the economic and social roles of higher education institutions.
At the Melbourne meeting, the expertise of Prof. Jill Blackmore and Assoc. Prof. Cai Wilkinson made significant contributions to joint discussions. Special attention was given to international higher education trends, the impact of political and economic environments, and the changing value of degrees.
As part of the research work, the processing of relevant literature is also ongoing, led by Prof. Marie-Agnès Détourbe. The Australian experiences not only strengthen the international dimension of the research but also contribute to a deeper understanding of domestic higher education processes.
Beyond the professional program, the visit also provided practical insights: Australian administration, long-distance travel, and the specifics of local life are all factors that support the planning of future mobility programs. Melbourne’s multicultural environment and open-minded atmosphere provided a particularly inspiring setting for research. The collaboration clearly demonstrates that BUEB is actively present in the international academic sphere and is committed to participating in research shaping the future of higher education.
On this occasion, we conducted an exciting interview with Kolnhofer-Derecskei Anita, who shared her personal experiences and professional insights from the trip:
What was the most important professional takeaway from your time in Australia?
The structure and functioning of higher education are quite similar to the Hungarian system. Colleagues face similar challenges, and students are just as young and dynamic as at home. The biggest difference lies in Australia’s strong international appeal. There is a high number of international students, making cultural diversity more visible. This requires an open, flexible attitude and transparent communication. It is an excellent environment for examining the values highlighted in our research, as academic work is closely linked to ethics and well-being. At Deakin University, these are not abstract ideas but integral parts of everyday institutional culture.
What do you see as the biggest difference between Hungarian and Australian higher education?
The main difference lies in international integration and institutional mindset. Australian higher education is strongly internationally oriented, actively building on international students and partnerships. In contrast, Hungarian higher education is more shaped by historical traditions and political and financial frameworks, which influence institutional autonomy and daily operations.
Were there any practices worth adopting in Hungary?
Yes, particularly the conscious management of academic work and institutional-level support for the well-being of educators and researchers. It is also notable that universities see themselves as active social and economic actors and consistently act accordingly. Diversity among students and staff encourages a more open and flexible approach. These could serve as valuable examples for Hungarian institutions.
What was it like working with researchers from Deakin University?
The collaboration took place in a constructive and supportive atmosphere. Discussions were based on genuine dialogue, allowing for meaningful exchange on higher education practices and challenges. Beyond professional matters, discussing personal experiences also highlighted that academic work is a shared global space with similar challenges everywhere.
How did local experts contribute to the research?
Prof. Jill Blackmore and Assoc. Prof. Cai Wilkinson played a key role in preparing the research. Jill’s work provided important theoretical foundations, especially in academic ethics and well-being. Cai’s experience in Hungary added valuable comparative insights. Together, their expertise helped shape the analytical framework.
What was it like living and working on the other side of the world for a month?
It was both intense and inspiring. The different academic culture and multicultural environment offered new perspectives. Arriving from winter conditions into 42°C summer heat was striking. The biggest challenge was adjusting to left-hand traffic. However, having lived there before helped me adapt more easily.
What were the biggest challenges during the trip?
Organization, especially visa processes, administration, and housing. Distances in Melbourne are vast, and strict entry regulations require careful preparation. Time zone differences and seasonal changes also required adjustment.
What experience has had the biggest impact on you?
The openness of the academic environment and the way ethical issues and challenges are discussed transparently. This mindset will influence my future work. I also learned the importance of structure and balance in education.
What advice would you give to others planning a similar research trip?
Start planning early, especially visa and administrative processes. Clearly define professional goals, plan finances, and maintain continuous communication with both home and host institutions.
What should one focus on most during preparation?
Securing accommodation in advance, planning transport, and considering time differences and academic calendars. Support from the host institution is invaluable, but administrative responsibilities must also be managed.
Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to all colleagues who contributed to making this professional journey possible. On the sending institution’s side (BUEB), the trip was coordinated by Zsuzsanna Géring, Head of Research, professional project leader, while administrative support was provided by László Varga. At the host institution, Prof. Jill Blackmore and Assoc. Prof. Cai Wilkinson offered essential professional guidance and support, ensuring the success of the collaboration.
WP5 is led by Prof. Marie-Agnès Détourbe (Vice-President of ECIU University, INSA Group).
Project financed from the NRDI Fund
Project number 2025-3.1.2-KÖA-2025-00015